Nash: "We felt that it was unfair to subject parents to having to buy Office 2007 for example: that’s roughly $400."
Education provider Scholars International Academy (SIA) has opted for open-source software and thin client systems, in a bid to save parents the cost of proprietary software. Sharjah-based SIA chose a number of freely available open-source programs - including OpenOffice and the Solaris 10 operating system - to run on top of its new thin clients and servers from Sun Microsystems, which it finished installing last year.
John Nash, network manager and head of ICT for SIA, said: "This academic year, rather than using proprietary software, what we've done is be slightly different and use things like the GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) instead of Photoshop, Scribus for desktop publishing and InkScape, which is a full, scalable vector graphics program."
He has made very clear that going with open source software was not solely to cut costs for the school but an attempt to lower the barrier of entry to IT for the students.
"We have parents who cover a broad spectrum of the payscale and we felt that it was unfair to subject them to having to buy Office 2007 for example, so that their child could keep up with the work. That's roughly $400. But a few months later when we start doing Photoshop, the children come home asking for Photoshop -again, that's another $400. Before the parents know where they are, they're more than $800 out of pocket just to keep their child in the ICT field," he explained.
Nash dismissed concerns about differences in usability between open-source and proprietary software, saying that these programs actually offer a broader experience for users.
"I'm giving them options and teaching them skillsets that are transferable between the two programs, rather than just teaching them: ‘This is Microsoft Office, this is how we use it'. The other reason we've chosen this software is because they are community-based and it means that as we start to roll out into our secondary phase, the children will be well-versed in using those programs and they will hopefully be able to become part of the community in a variety of ways," said Nash.
SIA has installed sixteen thin clients in its student labs, with an option to increase to 70 clients in the future. The implementation includes two Sun servers running Solaris 10 and serving virtual instances of Windows XP to the thin clients via VMware.
Nash said that he was first introduced to the idea of thin clients and open source software at GITEX last year: "I looked at the traditional style network with a normal Windows boxes, but I wasn't particularly comfortable with that. The board didn't need much convincing - it matched in so well with our ideals and aims of being environmentally friendly that they saw the benefit and doubled the initial budget to make sure that we could secure the Sun servers."
Nash adds that ecological concerns played a role in the selection process: "The SIA has a very strong environmental theme running through the whole school so I wanted to reflect that in the ICT infrastructure that we were going to use. The thin clients, for example, only take 4W of power as opposed to a desktop system which takes 16W of power."
User Comments (10 comments) 
Posted by Ron Saldanha - Happy Linux based Ubuntu user, Dubai, UAE on 21 May 2009 at 15:22 UAE time
Linux all the way!
Posted by CK1, Dubai, U.A.E. on 21 May 2009 at 15:01 UAE time
I am not sure when "Tech Guy" used these products, as he says he "recently" had them but "carted off the last bit of them a few years back".
We use the latest ones of these in our office environment and they work like regular PCs - just without the bulk and noise of a PC an without the power waste from PCs.
Sure, people were sceptical when the thin clients were introduced, but they worked from day 1 without problems.
And data exchange is simply through memory sticks (yes, they work like on a PC too). One just has to configure the system properly, which is what Tech Guy obviously missed out on.
The main reason for his users to reject the thin clients was probably that in such a controlled environment they could not "customise" (=screw up) the set up and not load all their games, mp3s and movies on.
And especially in student environments that traditionally require frequent re-installation efforts the virtual environments will dramatically reduce the administration overheads.
A move from Office 2003 to Open/StarOffice requires a bit of a learning curve. While both products do what they need to do, the differences in user interface, menu options etc. does take a while to get used to.
But it is only a fraction of the effort required to migrate to Office 2007's entirely new interface! And there is no license cost to it while M$ will gladly rip you off for this.
Especially in education environments any effort to lower cost has to be lauded - at least as long as these savings are being passed on to the parents in form of lower schooling fees (that are too high in this country anyway).
This is certainly the way to go and one has to congratulate Mr. Nash for his decision.
Posted by Idealist, Dubai, UAE on 21 May 2009 at 13:48 UAE time
"I'm giving them options and teaching them skillsets that are transferable between the two programs, rather than just teaching them: ‘This is Microsoft Office, this is how we use it'."
This the the bottom line, Tech guy.
99% of the people are taught what which button does, instead of how to do the actual work with any software. Software should and does not matter, no more than the brand of the pencil or the pen that you use matters. What, you refuse to work with Staedtler, only Faber Castell works?
But for that, you have to actually know how to do something, and not think that knowing what which button in MS Office does is a profession.
Applause for the school!
Posted by Tech Guy j-Sun on 21 May 2009 at 00:19 UAE time
Coming from a school system who recently had a sun thin client system I can say with authority that all the clams of "saving" money and how great of a system it will be fall drastically short when actually used in a school/learning environment. First off the system is completely NOT user friendly or intuitive. The only way to take files home from the system was to e-mail them to your self, not great for students to bring in files from home or vice versa. It did not play well with windows systems, the admin team all ended up using windows machines after the first year. As great as Open Office is, you try teaching a whole school of staff how to use it when they are already used to MS office! Finally fact is there are next to zero applications for lower school/ elementary learning. Which made them useless for younger kids. In the end they just turned into really expensive internet terminals and the staff threw a party when we carted off the last bit of them a few years back.
Bottom line, I would be willing to be money that after the first year many people are going to regret this decision.
Posted by Muhammad Usman, Lahore, Pakistan on 6 February 2009 at 09:29 UAE time
When i read the news i really feel good, i am also interested to work for educational structure. Open source OS and Software for Servers and Desktop is really giving us good command to handle not only Business and to educate our new beans.
Posted by Arnold L. Johnson, Lorain, USA on 8 January 2009 at 01:58 UAE time
I clapped my hands and shouted. There is much talk about a digital-gap, when folks can't afford the software used at work and/or school to put on the home computers. Now schools are strapped also. FOSS is a great liberator and equalizer. Schools should be about skills training, not product training. And like one previous writer has said students involvement in the user community support network is an enlarging learning experience both for themselves and the software.
Posted by Christopher Saul on 3 June 2008 at 23:05 UAE time
Sun Ray 2s use only 4vwatts - PCs use more than 16, more like 80 to 120 watts!
Posted by Fadi Yousuf, Dubai, UAE on 2 June 2008 at 22:16 UAE time
Excellent Approach...
There are a lot of open source applications available out there with fantastic functionality. Check www.blender.org for example for 3D animation software.
Definitely a step on the right track and I hope everyone follows suit. Let's all go towards an eco-friendly, open and collaborative framework...
Posted by max stirner on 2 June 2008 at 21:08 UAE time
lovely stuff - just what the education sector needs!
free software ought to be mandatory in education precisely for the reasons you mention:
- social inclusion: avoid prohibitive costs for proprietary software. if proprietary software offers advanced features, these may be acquired by the students in commercial settings as (if?) required.
- community: student involvement in online community support and development ecosystems may actually foster their talents in the area, and permit them to get involved in the underlying development process.
welcome to the future!
Posted by Daniel, Madrid, Spain on 2 June 2008 at 14:43 UAE time
I just would like to precise that power and consumption are not the same.
A desktop system may have a 300W power suply which means that this would be the maximum power the system can deliver. But it should be running at an average of 120-160 W. Per example, a single memory RAM consumes less than 5W, if I am correct.
The electrical consumption of a basic PC + 19" Basic LCD may be around 300 kWh/year (Running 8 hours a day).
The consumption of a thin client, per example from Sun (Only 4W of Power consumption!!!) with the same monitor and running under the same conditions would be around 90 kWh/year.
After doing these numbers, we can all asume that PC vendors have a lot to do regarding consumption efficiency.
Anyway...a very wise and ecological decision from Mr. Nash.