The Satyam scandal continues to unravel, with the arrest of the Raju brothers and now the CFO being questioned by police, and the rumour mill of the Indian press going into overdrive with speculation on the role of the auditors, the whereabouts of various directors, a suicide attempt, unpaid staff and inflated headcount.
To describe the situation as India’s Enron seems to be pretty accurate - while it will take time for the details to come out in full, it appears that the company’s problems stem from the highest level. Ramalinga Raju’s resignation letter to the board, which claimed that it was only him and his brother involved, and that they did not profit from the situation may have initially looked like a noble effort to take the blame for the mess he’d made, but now seems to be less than truthful, with two directors selling large parcels of shares in September.
The future certainly doesn’t look bright for Satyam, and there will be repercussions on the whole of India’s outsourcing industry. Satyam was the standard bearer for the sector, counting US and European giants like Ford and GE in its customer base. In the Middle East, Satyam has recently been making big inroads with Oracle and SAP deployments, a development centre in Egypt that was to provide 300 jobs and another centre planned for Qatar where the company already has 100 personnel. Business in the UAE alone was reportedly up 41% in the first financial quarter of this year. What will happen to this business now is anyone’s guess, but it doesn’t look promising.
The analysts are spelling doom for the company - Gartner points out the likely distraction that the investigation and subsequent compliance actitivites will cause, greater attrition of staff, reduced spend on R&D, staff development, and most fundamentally of all, loss of trust.
Outsourcing and services simply doesn’t work without trust. While corporate America and Europe are certainly not spotless when it comes to corporate crime, multinationals won’t deal with a company that is in this much trouble, and are also likely to question the status of other Indian services companies. If auditors and regulators were unable to uncover Satyam’s irregularities, then what might be happening in other services companies? It is probably already too late for the Indian services sector to escape without any damage from the Satyam scandal, so Indian authorities need to act fast to restore confidence and prove that the they are able to effectively regulate companies, and the companies themselves need to reassure customers and would be customers that they are trustworthy and credible business partners.

The ‘Satyam Scandal’, whilst it might possibly be ‘India’s Enron’, actually comes on the heels of a string of financial scandals that know no geprgraphical boundries:
The Madoff Debacle
The BNP-Paribas Fraud
Enron
WorldCom
What is however common to all of these scandals, is that the businesses in question were all huge and regularly audited by one of the ‘Big Four’! Surely therefore, it is in fact the internal processes and procedures of these auditing firms that need to be scrutinised, since in every case management malpractice appeares to have not only gone unnoticed, but that this malpractice seems to have been propogated over many years!
Comment by Bharat Jashanmal — Sunday, 11 January, 2009 @ 17:51
I wonder what the shareholders have to say.
Wonder what happens to all the ADs taking place on CNN Saytam has been advertising quite a bit on CNN.
They were interested in what I was doing and spearheading within the secured multimedia communication sector. They were interested and wanted
to find out more about my work.
Ashie Hirji
Heart In Action Ent
Comment by Ashie Hirji — Monday, 12 January, 2009 @ 13:41
Besides Raju Brothers and their gang of other members of the Board, Internal as well as External Auditors, Sebi and other Coporate Regulatory Bodies are equally
responsible and answerable. While Raju Brothers are
tried for cheating and playing with the public money,
the officials of other institutes mentioned above,
should also be tried for not either collaborating with
them in the crime or not being intelligent enough to
know about the fraud before hand.
Comment by gagan mehta — Thursday, 15 January, 2009 @ 19:34