SirCam tops viruses for August

The e-mail virus SirCam accounted for nearly 50% of all infections during August, according to figures from Sophos. The much talked about Code Red virus trailed in in ninth place, responsible for 1.2% of infections.

  • E-Mail
By  Zoe Moleshead Published  September 4, 2001

Although the Code Red virus may be garnering all the headlines, the SirCam virus is still the most prevalent accounting for nearly 50% of all infections last month.

SirCam’s programming allows it to constantly change its name, and therefore making it difficult to detect. The e-mail virus also minimises detection by generating its own e-mail client.

“Unlike the Lovebug or Melissa it [SirCam] didn’t hit hard when it was first released, but now is still around in huge numbers months later,” Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos told Silicon.com.

The e-mail virus has continued to spread despite the availability of patches since July. Sophos revealed SirCam was responsible for 49.8% of August infections, while another familiar virus, Magistr claimed the second spot with 13%.

“You begin to ask just how many times I need to say this before people start taking these threats seriously,” added Cluley.

Code Red took the ninth spot in Sophos’ list with only 1.2% of infections, while other entrants in the top ten include Sadmind, Hybris-B, Apology-B and Kakworm.

Code Red, however, is proving one of the costliest viruses though. According to Computer Economics’ research, Code Red has cost companies $2.6 billion, while SirCam has hit companies for $1.03 billion.

The cost of the viruses is calculated using the loss of productivity and downtime, with the total costs to companies so far this year totalling $10.7 billion.

Add a Comment

Your display name This field is mandatory

Your e-mail address This field is mandatory (Your e-mail address won't be published)

Security code